<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for PSYCHOLOGY MATTERS</title>
	<link>http://www.paladinexec.com/blog</link>
	<description>A Paladin Associates Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Myers-Briggs Personality Type and Decision-Making by Gerry Forde</title>
		<link>http://www.paladinexec.com/blog/2008/04/18/myers-briggs-personality-type-and-decision-making/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry Forde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.paladinexec.com/blog/2008/04/18/myers-briggs-personality-type-and-decision-making/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>There appears to be no direct correlation between the extraversion (E)  /  introversion (I)  preference  dichotomy with regard to problem solving and decision making process. 

I would suggest there is a difference in the quality of introverted and extraverted problem solving and decision making. The extraverted process will always be quicker than that of the introvert. This stems from the magnetism between the extravert and the object - he is drawn in to the object, assimilates himself to the interaction which is immediate. The introvert holds himself back from the object and waits to see how the object fits his subjective scale of values. There will always be a delay therefore in judging and in the decision making process for the introvert. This has major consequences for a world that is dominated by extraverts and the extraverted style of instant judgement and decision making. Motions can be carried at meetings before even the Jugding Introverts have had time to contribute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There appears to be no direct correlation between the extraversion (E)  /  introversion (I)  preference  dichotomy with regard to problem solving and decision making process. </p>
<p>I would suggest there is a difference in the quality of introverted and extraverted problem solving and decision making. The extraverted process will always be quicker than that of the introvert. This stems from the magnetism between the extravert and the object - he is drawn in to the object, assimilates himself to the interaction which is immediate. The introvert holds himself back from the object and waits to see how the object fits his subjective scale of values. There will always be a delay therefore in judging and in the decision making process for the introvert. This has major consequences for a world that is dominated by extraverts and the extraverted style of instant judgement and decision making. Motions can be carried at meetings before even the Jugding Introverts have had time to contribute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Defining the Leadership Style and Organizational Cultural of the Bush Administration by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.paladinexec.com/blog/2008/02/07/the-decider-2/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.paladinexec.com/blog/2008/02/07/the-decider-2/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>It would appear that some aspects such as stability and reliability are positive for the most part but not always.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would appear that some aspects such as stability and reliability are positive for the most part but not always.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Insight into How Clinton Will Manage the Presidency by Donna Strube</title>
		<link>http://www.paladinexec.com/blog/2008/02/24/an-insight-into-how-clinton-will-manage-the-presidency/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Strube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 22:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.paladinexec.com/blog/2008/02/24/an-insight-into-how-clinton-will-manage-the-presidency/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>An interesting discussion that certainly highlights the difference between the candidates' personalities and leadership styles. Currently, Hillary's camapaign exhibits morale problems as well as her unwillingness to share her softer/human side with voters. Obama's campaign, however, displays enthusiasm for his candidacy as well as determination to see him chosen as the Democratic nominee. It is a fascinating time in American politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting discussion that certainly highlights the difference between the candidates&#8217; personalities and leadership styles. Currently, Hillary&#8217;s camapaign exhibits morale problems as well as her unwillingness to share her softer/human side with voters. Obama&#8217;s campaign, however, displays enthusiasm for his candidacy as well as determination to see him chosen as the Democratic nominee. It is a fascinating time in American politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Billary vs. Obama:Transactional/Transformational Psychological Differences by PSYCHOLOGY MATTERS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; An Insight into How Clinton Will Manage the Presidency</title>
		<link>http://www.paladinexec.com/blog/2008/01/25/billary-vs-obamatransactionaltransformational-psychological-differences/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>PSYCHOLOGY MATTERS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; An Insight into How Clinton Will Manage the Presidency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.paladinexec.com/blog/2008/01/25/billary-vs-obamatransactionaltransformational-psychological-differences/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] good insight into how a Hillary Clinton presidency might be managed. As we have pointed out in an earlier blog, the Clinton approach to management is basically transactional. That means there will be enforced [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] good insight into how a Hillary Clinton presidency might be managed. As we have pointed out in an earlier blog, the Clinton approach to management is basically transactional. That means there will be enforced [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Psychology of Change in Politics : The Hillary/Obama Issue by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.paladinexec.com/blog/2008/01/21/the-psychology-of-change-in-politicsthe-hillaryobama-issue/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.paladinexec.com/blog/2008/01/21/the-psychology-of-change-in-politicsthe-hillaryobama-issue/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
