The Murphy-Meisgeier Type Indicator for Children® / MBTI for Children

The concept that each of us is born with a specific set of preferences is central to Carl Jung’s theory of psychological type. While these preferences are innate it is during the elementary school years that a child first begins to cultivate these preferences and develop his / her own unique style of taking in and processing information. Knowledge of a child’s unique personality type provides an understanding of how the child: Absorbs information /  Prioritizes information / and Makes decisions about information. Type recognition during a child’s developmental years provides an enormous benefit to the child. When a child is afforded an environment, which provides the freedom to develop his / her natural preferences, he or she develops a much higher levels of self-esteem and self-confidence. In addition to which an overall understanding of the child’s personality preferences facilitates an improved relationship between the child and the parents.While The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator has long been the most valid and reliable instrument for measuring personality preferences in adults, it has not proven suitable for children. The Murphy-Meisgeier Type Indicator for children was developed to fill this need. Like the MBTI , the Murphy-Meisgeier Type Indicator for Children (MMTIC) is a self-report assessment of psychological type. With the help of The Murphy-Meisgeier Type Indicator it is possible to identify the personality types of children grades 2 through high school.

Myers-Briggs / Jung Psychology Type Functions

Within the framework of Carl  G. Jung / Myers-Briggs personality type theory  functions refer to the mental processes used to take-in and process information.  There are four functions.  Sensing  and intuition , which represent and individual’s preference for taking in data from the environment.  An individual uses both of these functions but has a natural tendency to favor one over the other.  The sensor prefers using his / her sensing function.  Those with a sensing preference make concrete and realistic observation of objects or circumstances in the immediate environment. Where as an individual with a natural tendency for the intuitive preference makes mental connections with observations of his / her surroundings and may perceive something entirely different from the sensing type person. Sensors tend to make very detailed observations of their environment and initiatives are very general in their observations.  The thinking and feeling function address how and individual processes data and makes decisions. As with the sensing and intuitive functions an individual uses both the thinking and feeling function but is naturally drawn to use one of the functions over the other.   A person with a thinking preference uses objectivity as criteria when making decisions.  This type is considered to be very logical and methodical in the decision making process.  A person with a feeling preference for decision-making uses a subjective approach.  Individuals with a preference for the feeling function believe that personal considerations are important and should not be left out of decision-making.  Individuals with a preference for feeling are also very value oriented in their decision making process, their personal values are at the center of how they arrive at decisions and can not be in conflict with the decision that is made.         Dominate Function: An individual’s most highly refined function, it is the function an individual prefers using the most often.      Auxiliary Function:  An individuals’ second most preferred function.  The auxiliary function works with and supports the dominant function.     Tertiary Function:  An individual’s third preferred function.  It is a lesser-developed function, which works to support the auxiliary function.    Inferior Function:   An individuals’ least developed function. The inferior function is the opposite function of the dominant function, for example and individual who is a dominant thinker would have feeling  as an inferior function and an individual who is a dominant feeler  would have thinking  as an inferior function.